JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use the Site in standard view. However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser. To use standard view, enable JavaScript by changing your browser options.

 
| Last Updated:: 05/09/2024

Water Quality Status of Drain

 

 

     

 

August-2024

July - 2024

June - 2024

May - 2024

April - 2024

March - 2024

February - 2024

January - 2024

December - 2023

November - 2023

 October - 2023

September- 2023

August - 2023

July - 2023

June-2023

May - 2023

April - 2023

March - 2023

February - 2023

January - 2023

December - 2022

November - 2022

October - 2022

September - 2022

August - 2022

July - 2022

June - 2022

May-2022

April -2022

March - 2022

February - 2022

January - 2022

December - 2021

November - 2021

October - 2021

September - 2021

August – 2021

July-2021      

June - 2021  

April - 2021

March-2021

February - 2021

January - 2021

December - 2020

November - 2020

October - 2020

September - 2020

August - 2020

July - 2020

June - 2020

April – 2020

March – 2020

February – 2020

January – 2020

December – 2019

November – 2019

October - 2019

September – 2019

August - 2019

July - 2019

 

Updated on 5th  August, 2024

 

Water Quality of Drains  March, 2020  (Pre-lockdown) and April, 2020 (Lockdown)

 

Parameters
WaterQualityofDrains
Pre-Lockdown
Lockdown
 
Location:NajafgarhDrain
pH
7.3
7.3
SS (mg/l)
152
106 (-30.26%)
BOD(mg/l)
78
55(-29.49%)
COD (mg/l)
271
150(-44.65%)
Conductivity(µs/cm)
-
1501
Location:ShahdaraDrain
pH
7.1
7.2
SS(mg/l)
464
305 (-34.27%)
BOD(mg/l)
163
89(-45.4%)
COD(mg/l)
574
383(-33.28%)
Conductivity(µs/cm)
-
1,657
Note:**Pre lockdown(March 04,2020)                                            ***Lockdown (April06,.2020)

 

Source: CPCB Annual Report 2020-21, Updated on 3rd Aug, 2022

 

Percentage distribution of villages by method of disposal of drainage water

  

 

 

Percentage distribution of villages by method of disposal of

 

 

 

 

drainage water

 

 

S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State/UT

 

 

With arrangement

 

 

No.

No

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

any

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

arrangement

Pond

Nala

River

other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

source

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Andhra Pradesh

32.9

17.1

30.3

8.6

11.2

100

2

Assam

59.5

1.2

26.8

8.3

4.2

100

3

Bihar

61.2

2.9

13.9

5.3

16.7

100

4

Chhattisgarh

73.0

2.0

12.0

3.0

10.0

100

5

Gujarat

62.7

11.9

11.9

10.2

3.4

100

6

Haryana

4.1

73.5

14.3

2.0

6.1

100

7

Himachal Pradesh

37.0

2.8

49.1

1.9

9.3

100

8

Jammu & Kashmir

44.0

3.2

40.0

8.8

4.0

100

9

Jharkhand

86.9

3.1

6.2

1.5

2.3

100

10

Karnataka

18.9

16.1

42.0

6.3

16.8

100

11

Kerala

71.5

0.6

17.1

9.5

1.3

100

12

Madhya Pradesh

50.5

7.8

18.2

4.2

19.3

100

13

Maharashtra

18.3

7.6

46.8

19.4

8.0

100

14

Manipur

15.2

0.0

53.2

15.2

16.5

100

15

Meghalaya

85.7

0.0

14.3

0.0

0.0

100

16

Mizoram

63.6

0.0

27.3

4.5

4.5

100

17

Nagaland

9.6

0.0

48.1

42.3

0.0

100

18

Odisha

82.8

1.0

10.1

0.5

5.6

100

19

Punjab

2.0

63.4

30.7

0.0

4.0

100

20

Rajasthan

57.3

10.4

16.7

3.6

12.0

100

21

Sikkim

48.5

0.0

27.3

21.2

3.0

100

22

Tamil Nadu

46.3

23.4

18.3

7.3

4.6

100

23

Telangana

12.8

25.5

41.5

4.3

16.0

100

24

Uttar Pradesh

8.6

57.9

15.2

4.7

13.6

100

25

Uttarakhand

60.3

2.9

25.0

2.9

8.8

100

26

West Bengal

70.3

5.6

13.7

3.6

6.8

100

 

All India

44.4

15.8

24.0

6.8

9.0

100

 

Source : Swachhta Status Report 2016, updated on 25th November, 2016